13. 1. Minor faults shall be dealt with informally.

    2. Where the matter is more serious but falls short of constituting possible good cause for dismissal the following procedure shall be used

       Stage 1 - Oral Warning

       If conduct or performance does not meet acceptable standards the member of the academic staff will normally be given a formal oral warning. The member will be advised of the reason for the warning, that it is the first stage of the disciplinary procedure and of the right to appeal under this paragraph. A brief note of the oral warning will be kept but it will be spent after 12 months, subject to satisfactory conduct and performance.

       Stage 2 - Written Warning

       If the offence is a serious one, or if a further offence occurs, a written warning will be given to the member of the academic staff by the Head of Department. This will give details of the complaint, the improvement required and the timescale. It will warn that a complaint may be made to the Secretary and Registrar seeking the institution of charges to be heard by a Tribunal appointed under paragraph 16 if there is no satisfactory improvement and will advise of the right of appeal under this paragraph. A copy of this written warning will be kept by the Head of Department but it will be disregarded for disciplinary purposes after 2 years subject to satisfactory conduct and performance.

       Stage 3 - Appeals

       A member of the academic staff who wishes to appeal against a disciplinary warning shall inform the Secretary and Registrar within two weeks. A Deputy Vice-Chancellor shall hear all such appeals and his or her decision shall be final.

Preliminary examination of serious disciplinary matters

14. 1. If there has been no satisfactory improvement following a written warning given under Stage 2 of the procedure in paragraph 13, or in any other case where it is alleged that conduct or performance may constitute good cause for dismissal or removal from office, a complaint seeking the institution of charges to be heard by a Tribunal appointed under paragraph 16 may be made to the Secretary and Registrar who shall bring it to the attention of the Vice-Chancellor.

    2. To enable the Vice-Chancellor to deal fairly with any complaint brought to his or her attention under sub-paragraph (1) he or she shall institute such investigations or enquiries (if any) as appear to him or her to be necessary.

    3. If it appears to the Vice-Chancellor that a complaint brought to his or her attention under sub-paragraph (1) relates to conduct or performance which does not meet acceptable standards but for which no written warning has been given under paragraph 13 or which relates to a particular alleged infringement of rules, regulations or byelaws for which a standard penalty is normally imposed in the University or within the faculty, school, department or other relevant area, or is trivial or invalid he or she may dismiss it summarily, or decide not to proceed further under this Part.

    4. If the Vice-Chancellor does not dispose of a complaint under sub-paragraph (3) he or she shall treat the complaint as disclosing a sufficient reason for proceeding further under this Part and, if he or she sees fit, he or she may suspend the member on full pay pending a final decision.

    5. Where the Vice-Chancellor proceeds further under this Part he or she shall write to the member of the academic staff concerned inviting comment in writing.

    6. As soon as may be following receipt of the comments (if any) the Vice-Chancellor shall consider the matter in the light of all the material then available and may -
       1. dismiss it himself or herself; or
       2. refer it for consideration under paragraph 13; or
       3. deal with it informally himself or herself if it appears to the Vice-Chancellor appropriate to do so and if the member of the academic staff agrees in writing that the matter should be dealt with in that way; or
       4. direct the Secretary and Registrar to prefer a charge or charges to be considered by a Tribunal to be appointed under paragraph 16.
    7. If no comment is received within 28 days the Vice-Chancellor may proceed as aforesaid as if the member concerned had denied the substance and validity of the alleged case in its entirety.

Institution of Charges

15. 1. In any case where the Vice-Chancellor has directed that a charge or charges be preferred under paragraph 14(6)(d), he or she shall request the Council to appoint a Tribunal under paragraph 16 to hear the charge or charges and to determine whether the conduct or performance of the member of the academic staff concerned constitutes good cause for dismissal or otherwise constitutes a serious complaint relating to the member's appointment or employment.

    2. Where the Council has been requested to appoint a Tribunal under paragraph 16 the Secretary and Registrar or, if he or she is unable to act, another officer appointed by the Vice-Chancellor shall take charge of the proceedings.

    3. The officer in charge of the proceedings shall formulate, or arrange for the formulation of, the charge or charges and shall present, or arrange for the presentation of, the charge or charges before the Tribunal.

    4. It shall be the duty of the officer in charge of the proceedings
       1. to forward the charge or charges to the Tribunal and to the member of the academic staff concerned together with the other documents therein specified, and
       2. to make any necessary administrative arrangements for the summoning of witnesses, the production of documents and generally for the proper presentation of the case before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal

16. A Tribunal appointed by the Council shall comprise:
    1. a Chair; and
    2. one member of the Council, not being a person employed by the University; and
    3. one member of the academic staff nominated by the Senate.

Provisions concerning Tribunal procedure

17. 1. The procedure to be followed in respect of the preparation, hearing and determination of charges by a Tribunal shall be that set out in Ordinances made under this paragraph.

    2. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing such Ordinances shall ensure -
       1. that the member of the academic staff concerned is entitled to be represented by another person, whether such person be legally qualified or not, in connection with and at any hearing of charges by a Tribunal;
       2. that a charge shall not be determined without an oral hearing at which the member of the academic staff concerned and any person appointed by him or her to represent him or her are entitled to be present;
       3. that the member of the academic staff and any person representing the staff member may call witnesses and may question witnesses upon the evidence on which the case against him or her is based; and
       4. that full and sufficient provision is made -
          1. for postponements, adjournments, dismissal of the charge or charges for want of prosecution, remission of the charge or charges to the Vice-Chancellor for further consideration and for the correction of accidental errors; and
          2. for appropriate time limits for each stage (including the hearing) to the intent that any charge thereunder shall be heard and determined by a Tribunal as expeditiously as reasonably practicable.

Notification of Tribunal decisions

18. 1. A Tribunal shall send its decision on any charge referred to it (together with its findings of fact and the reasons for its decision regarding that charge and its recommendations, if any, as to the appropriate penalty) to the Vice-Chancellor and to each party to the proceedings.

    2. A Tribunal shall draw attention to the period of time within which any appeal should be made by ensuring that a copy of Part V (Appeals) accompanies each copy of its decision sent to a party to the proceedings under this paragraph.

Powers of the appropriate officer where charges are upheld by Tribunal

19. 1. Where the charge or charges are upheld and the Tribunal finds good cause and recommends dismissal or removal from office, but in no other case, the appropriate officer shall decide whether or not to dismiss the member of the academic staff concerned.

    2. In any case where the charge or charges are upheld, other than where the appropriate officer has decided under sub-paragraph (1) to dismiss the member of the academic staff concerned, the action available to the appropriate officer (not comprising a greater penalty than that recommended by the Tribunal) may be -
       1. to discuss the issues raised with the member concerned; or
       2. to advise the member concerned about his or her future conduct; or
       3. to warn the member concerned; or
       4. to suspend the member concerned for such period as the appropriate officer shall think fair and reasonable, not to exceed 3 months after the Tribunal's decision; or
       5. any combination of any of the above or such further or other action under the member's contract of employment or terms of appointment as appears fair and reasonable in all the circumstances of the case.

Appropriate Officers

20. 1. The Vice-Chancellor shall be the appropriate officer to exercise the powers conferred by paragraph 19 and any reference to the appropriate officer includes a reference to a delegate of that officer.

    2. Any action taken by the appropriate officer shall be confirmed in writing.